SPF Discuss (date)
December 31, 2004
- SPF For Sendmail, Lennon - Orcon, 18:49
- Broken Mail Servers..., Lennon - Orcon, 17:59
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nick Phillips, 16:10
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Stephen Pollei, 12:02
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, wayne, 12:02
- MS Exchange support for SenderID is 6-12 months away, wayne, 11:32
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Greg Connor, 10:42
- RE: latest and greatest: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00, John Glube, 05:14
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nick Phillips, 05:09
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Greg Connor, 03:47
December 30, 2004
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 22:09
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, John A. Martin, 18:50
- latest and greatest: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00, wayne, 18:04
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Mark Shewmaker, 15:36
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 14:38
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 14:29
- Re: Mailserver Question, Greg Connor, 14:00
- N00b question - setting up sendmail milter, Kyle Hutson, 13:36
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 12:58
- Mailserver Question, administrator, 11:06
- Re: New to SPF, Commerco WebMaster, 10:37
- New to SPF, Nurv, 10:16
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Hector Santos, 07:33
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:25
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Rene Barbier, 04:05
- Re: Include Results, Rene Barbier, 03:48
- Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Øyvind Henriksen, 03:48
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 03:45
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 03:15
- Include Results, Hector Santos, 03:06
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Rene Barbier, 01:46
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 01:12
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Hector Santos, 00:57
December 29, 2004
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 23:02
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Hector Santos, 22:39
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 22:07
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, wayne, 21:48
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, wayne, 21:42
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, wayne, 21:36
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 21:35
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 21:34
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, wayne, 20:27
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 20:21
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:47
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 16:53
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 16:35
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, John A. Martin, 16:22
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:05
- Zonecuts specified in SPF draft (was draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available), william(at)elan.net, 14:54
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 14:16
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 13:30
- Re: suggestions for "compressing" number of SPF result values?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:16
- Re: suggestions for "compressing" number of SPF result values?, Meng Weng Wong, 05:05
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 00:10
December 28, 2004
- suggestions for "compressing" number of SPF result values?, Chris Markle, 23:00
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:05
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: Opinions wanted: forgery notice DSN, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:33
- Re: Opinions wanted: forgery notice DSN, Stephen Pollei, 13:26
- Re: Opinions wanted: forgery notice DSN, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:20
- Re: Opinions wanted: forgery notice DSN, Leonard Mills, 12:54
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, John A. Martin, 12:52
- Opinions wanted: forgery notice DSN, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:43
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, Leonard Mills, 12:26
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 12:15
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 10:54
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:39
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, william(at)elan.net, 00:58
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 00:35
December 27, 2004
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 21:08
- draft-schlitt-spf-02 now available and submitted to the IETF, wayne, 16:29
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Hector Santos, 16:22
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:46
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:34
- draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 15:29
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:22
December 24, 2004
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Chuck Mead, 15:37
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, SmallFries, 15:33
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, william(at)elan.net, 14:02
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, william(at)elan.net, 13:47
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Chuck Mead, 13:43
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Chuck Mead, 13:23
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Chuck Mead, 12:42
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, nkadel, 11:53
- RE: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records forall A records., terry, 05:41
- Council: Weekly Meeting on 2004-12-22, Julian Mehnle, 04:54
December 23, 2004
- RE: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Greg Connor, 23:47
- Re: Who controls the future of SPF V1 and beyond?, william(at)elan.net, 14:05
- Who controls the future of SPF V1 and beyond?, Guy, 13:18
- RE: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, william(at)elan.net, 12:50
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Chuck Mead, 12:31
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 09:23
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 09:09
- RE: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Guy, 08:58
- RE: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Guy, 08:47
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Hector Santos, 07:37
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 07:24
- RE: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Dan Field, 07:11
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 07:03
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 07:00
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 06:53
- Re: Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, Rene Barbier, 06:38
- Sender-ID in Gmail advertising, jpinkerton, 04:57
- Re: thoughts on disruptive innovation as synthesis between incumbent and startup, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 02:59
December 22, 2004
- RE: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:06
- OT Patents was Looks like MS are losing in Europe, Stephen Pollei, 12:12
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 11:34
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Lloyd Zusman, 11:02
- Re: Looks like MS are losing in Europe, jpinkerton, 10:51
- Re: thoughts on disruptive innovation as synthesis between incumbent and startup, Hector Santos, 10:47
- Re: Looks like MS are losing in Europe, Hector Santos, 10:42
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 10:39
- Looks like MS are losing in Europe, jpinkerton, 10:24
- Re: Using best-guess, jpinkerton, 10:22
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Lloyd Zusman, 10:09
- Re: thoughts on disruptive innovation as synthesis between incumbent and startup, Dave Crocker, 09:31
- RE: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., terry, 05:21
- Re: thoughts on disruptive innovation as synthesis between incumbent and startup, william(at)elan.net, 00:27
December 21, 2004
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 23:00
- thoughts on disruptive innovation as synthesis between incumbent and startup, Meng Weng Wong, 22:25
- Re: Using best-guess, Greg Connor, 22:04
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Scott Kitterman, 20:15
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Lloyd Zusman, 19:39
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Ralf Doeblitz, 13:33
- Re: Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., william(at)elan.net, 06:50
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A recor, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:44
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:12
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:04
December 20, 2004
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., nkadel, 19:45
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Meng Weng Wong, 19:22
- Re: [OT] Judge Awards $1B in spam damages to ISP, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:57
- Re: Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Stuart D. Gathman, 14:52
- [OT] Judge Awards $1B in spam damages to ISP, James Couzens, 14:43
- Difficulties in specifying SPF TXT records for all A records., Ramgopal, Ram, 14:43
- RE: Draft Press Release Announcing the SPF Council, Mark Shewmaker, 13:47
December 19, 2004
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Hector Santos, 19:41
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Shane Rush, 13:29
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Chuck Mead, 08:18
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Chuck Mead, 08:18
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Chuck Mead, 08:12
- Re: Re: Open council and project issues, Jim Hill, 05:24
December 18, 2004
- Re: Open council and project issues, Frank Ellermann, 22:57
- RE: Open council and project issues, george+spf, 22:27
- Re: Open council and project issues, Frank Ellermann, 22:20
- Re: Open council and project issues, jpinkerton, 14:00
- RE: Open council and project issues, Julian Mehnle, 13:47
- RE: Open council and project issues, Julian Mehnle, 13:35
- RE: Open council and project issues, william(at)elan.net, 11:43
- Re: Open council and project issues, jpinkerton, 11:25
- Re: Open council and project issues, william(at)elan.net, 10:04
- RE: Open council and project issues, Julian Mehnle, 09:58
- Re: SPF Test Suites, Meng Weng Wong, 02:31
- Re: SPF Test Suites, Shoaib Ahmed Soomro, 00:31
December 17, 2004
- Re: Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Meng Weng Wong, 19:57
- fixing email, Meng Weng Wong, 19:50
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, william(at)elan.net, 19:22
- SPF Test Suites, Hector Santos, 19:16
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:43
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, guy, 15:44
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Roger Moser, 15:31
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:02
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Scott Kitterman, 14:17
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Brad Glore, 14:09
- Re: spfhelp.com was:RE: Proposal For The Council - Make SPF-Help Archive Public, jpinkerton, 13:56
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 13:48
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 13:41
- Re: Paul G. Pierson, Greg Connor, 12:51
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Scott Kitterman, 12:47
- Re: Paul G. Pierson, Jonathan Gardner, 12:43
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 10:30
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 09:29
- Re: Status of draft-lentczner-spf, Frank Ellermann, 09:27
- RE: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Scott Kitterman, 08:46
- spfhelp.com was:RE: Proposal For The Council - Make SPF-Help Archive Public, Scott Kitterman, 08:35
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 08:32
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 08:29
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 08:03
- RE: Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Scott Kitterman, 07:45
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Frank Ellermann, 07:33
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 07:28
- Re: Proposal For The Council - Make SPF-Help Archive Public, Frank Ellermann, 07:17
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, David Woodhouse, 07:08
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Jeroen Massar, 07:08
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Frank Ellermann, 07:04
- RE: Paul G. Pierson, Brad Glore, 06:37
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 06:28
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 05:27
- Re: Updating RFC 2505 - Anti-Spam Recommendations for SMTP MTAs, Hector Santos, 05:07
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 04:27
- Re: Updating RFC 2505 - Anti-Spam Recommendations for SMTP MTAs, David Woodhouse, 04:06
- Updating RFC 2505 - Anti-Spam Recommendations for SMTP MTAs, Hector Santos, 03:55
- Re: Proposal For The Council - Make SPF-Help Archive Public, jpinkerton, 03:48
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 03:27
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 02:38
- RE: Wildcat! SPF Support, gary, 02:38
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 01:27
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 00:26
December 16, 2004
- Paul G. Pierson/SS/HouInd is out of the office., Paul G Pierson, 23:26
- Proposal For The Council - Make SPF-Help Archive Public, Scott Kitterman, 23:00
- Internet Radio Interview with Hector Santos: SPF Plug!!, Hector Santos, 22:32
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Hector Santos, 22:18
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Theo Schlossnagle, 21:47
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Hector Santos, 21:30
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Meng Weng Wong, 20:05
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Seth Goodman, 18:14
- FYI - FTC tells us what is SPAM, william(at)elan.net, 11:24
- RE: Wildcat! SPF Support, terry, 10:12
- Re: Official SPF website (was: Wildcat! SPF Support), jpinkerton, 10:04
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:57
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, jpinkerton, 09:31
- Official SPF website (was: Wildcat! SPF Support), wayne, 07:18
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Jeremy Harris, 06:43
- RE: Wildcat! SPF Support, terry, 06:17
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 05:59
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, Hector Santos, 01:28
- Re: Wildcat! SPF Support, jpinkerton, 00:48
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:36
- Wildcat! SPF Support, Hector Santos, 00:19
December 15, 2004
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Seth Goodman, 23:31
- RE: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 16:00
- RE: numeric MX record and SPF, Greg Connor, 15:18
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Greg Connor, 15:10
- RE: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:05
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:42
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 14:13
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, wayne, 13:45
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 13:05
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, wayne, 12:31
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 11:37
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Hector Santos, 11:20
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 11:02
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 10:38
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, wayne, 10:32
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, wayne, 10:21
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, David Woodhouse, 09:56
- Re: Helo Domain, Mike, 07:17
- Off topic, but it's fun., Rodolfo Sikora, 07:13
- Re: Helo Domain, Peter Bowyer, 07:09
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 07:01
- Re: Helo Domain, Mike, 06:57
- Re: Helo Domain, Peter Bowyer, 06:39
- Re: Helo Domain, Mike, 05:59
- Re: Helo Domain, David Woodhouse, 05:41
- Re: Helo Domain, Peter Bowyer, 05:22
- Re: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Hector Santos, 05:20
- Helo Domain, Mike, 02:12
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:06
December 14, 2004
- Council: Weekly Meeting on 2004-12-11, Julian Mehnle, 18:27
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 15:17
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- RE: MASG Protocol Guidelines, Scott Kitterman, 14:47
- RE: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 14:24
- RE: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Scott Kitterman, 14:04
- RE: Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Scott Kitterman, 13:51
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Jonathan Gardner, 13:24
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 13:20
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 13:14
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 13:05
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:40
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 12:27
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, John A. Martin, 12:22
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 10:01
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:56
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:52
- RE: Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Mark, 06:33
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Roger Moser, 06:26
- Re: Re: numeric MX record and SPF, M Z R, 06:17
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:58
- RE: Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Mark, 05:51
- SPF and mailing lists: a broken implementation?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:37
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:30
- RE: numeric MX record and SPF, Mark, 04:31
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, william(at)elan.net, 03:40
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, william(at)elan.net, 03:08
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, M Z R, 02:16
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:12
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Roger B.A. Klorese, 02:06
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 01:54
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, jpinkerton, 01:21
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Meng Weng Wong, 00:58
December 13, 2004
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Stephen Pollei, 23:30
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, wayne, 20:53
- Fwd: Per user SPF policies - Question Re problems where mail users can not send through my mailserver, Scott Kitterman, 19:28
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 19:17
- Re: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 19:15
- Re: numeric MX record and SPF, Greg Connor, 18:05
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 17:58
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 17:45
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 17:44
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 17:43
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 17:29
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 17:03
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Hector Santos, 16:26
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:09
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:03
- numeric MX record and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:45
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:35
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:07
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:02
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 14:25
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 14:23
- RE: Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Scott Kitterman, 14:15
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 14:02
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 14:00
- Security Wire Perspectives mentions SenderID, Stephen Pollei, 13:55
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 13:55
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Scott Kitterman, 13:23
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 13:10
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 13:04
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 12:58
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 12:53
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 12:41
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:30
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Chris Haynes, 12:28
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 12:27
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 11:59
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:52
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, jpinkerton, 11:42
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 11:33
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:29
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 11:27
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:20
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Frank Ellermann, 11:19
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:16
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:15
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Scott Kitterman, 11:12
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 11:12
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 11:07
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Tony Finch, 11:01
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 10:55
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Robert Barclay, 10:41
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 10:23
- RE: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Julian Mehnle, 10:16
- Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker, 10:09
- Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Dave Crocker, 09:32
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 09:17
- Re: SPF HELO checking, administrator, 09:09
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Brian Barrios, 08:53
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Mark Shewmaker, 08:50
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Brian Barrios, 08:45
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 08:44
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:41
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 08:08
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 07:45
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Brian Barrios, 07:26
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Brian Barrios, 07:07
- Approaches to system design - Marketing vs Security and why MASG should not be standards group (was: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft), william(at)elan.net, 05:40
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, jpinkerton, 04:40
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 04:30
- RE: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 02:52
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, william(at)elan.net, 02:17
- Re: Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Mike Markley, 01:06
- Re: Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Mark Shewmaker, 00:14
December 12, 2004
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Shane Rush, 22:34
- Condorcet Voting for Council Elections and Council Votes, Shane Rush, 22:18
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Hector Santos, 22:01
- Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Frank Ellermann, 21:46
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 21:18
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Greg Connor, 20:50
- Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, wayne, 20:39
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Greg Connor, 20:38
- RE: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:29
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, terry, 20:26
- Re: Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), Chris Drake, 20:17
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, terry, 20:02
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Mark, 18:37
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, wayne, 18:32
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, william(at)elan.net, 18:30
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, David Woodhouse, 16:02
- Re[2]: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Sanford Whiteman, 15:57
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:22
- Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 12:21
- RE: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Mark, 12:04
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, william(at)elan.net, 12:04
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:45
- Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, John A. Martin, 10:37
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, william(at)elan.net, 10:37
- Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 10:20
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, John A. Martin, 10:03
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, John A. Martin, 10:02
- Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Theo Schlossnagle, 09:56
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:47
- [OT] IIM implementations, Michael Weiner, 09:44
- RE: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, terry, 09:37
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Greg Connor, 08:46
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 07:36
- Re: SPF HELO checking, william(at)elan.net, 06:34
- Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Roger Moser, 05:13
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton, 03:50
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 03:46
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 01:54
- Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 01:51
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Greg Connor, 00:48
- Re: Council: 2004-12-04: Constituent Meeting of the newly elected SPF Council, Frank Ellermann, 00:11
December 11, 2004
- Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 20:23
- Council: 2004-12-04: Constituent Meeting of the newly elected SPF Council, Julian Mehnle, 18:27
- Council: The SPF Council Thingy, Julian Mehnle, 18:22
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:35
- Re: MASG Protocol Guidelines, Mark Shewmaker, 14:04
- Re: MASG Protocol Guidelines, Scott Kitterman, 13:46
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 13:26
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 13:20
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 13:08
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 13:01
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 12:41
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 12:36
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 12:25
- MASG Protocol Guidelines, Mark Shewmaker, 12:04
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 11:30
- Re: When did SPF HELO checking start?, David, 11:23
- When did SPF HELO checking start?, wayne, 11:06
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 10:29
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 10:15
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 10:04
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:50
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:45
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:42
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Mark Shewmaker, 09:13
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 09:00
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 08:25
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Mark Shewmaker, 07:37
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 06:54
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 06:54
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Mark Shewmaker, 06:18
- Re: marketshare, Thijs van den Berg, 04:15
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 02:14
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 01:48
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 01:24
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:51
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:48
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:45
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 00:43
- Re: Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:40
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:36
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:31
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:28
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 00:27
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:25
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:22
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 00:19
- marketshare, Meng Weng Wong, 00:00
December 10, 2004
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 19:40
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Frank Ellermann, 19:22
- CSV RE: SPF HELO checking, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:28
- Agenda for Dec 11, 2004 Meeting of the SPF Leadership Council, Chuck Mead, 17:07
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 17:07
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:26
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 16:12
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, william(at)elan.net, 16:00
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Commerco WebMaster, 15:34
- Re: SPF HELO checking, william(at)elan.net, 15:22
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Commerco WebMaster, 15:13
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:55
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 14:52
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 14:39
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Commerco WebMaster, 14:21
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Greg Connor, 14:18
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 14:12
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 14:08
- Re: SPF HELO checking, william(at)elan.net, 13:46
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Scott Kitterman, 13:44
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:34
- RE: SPF HELO checking, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:25
- Re: SPF HELO checking, Michael Hammer, 13:00
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 12:30
- Re: SPF HELO checking, william(at)elan.net, 10:33
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 10:09
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Lou Katz, 10:04
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:26
- Re: SPF HELO checking, David, 09:21
- Re: SPF HELO checking, william(at)elan.net, 09:19
- SPF HELO checking, Roger Moser, 09:12
- Re: SPF HELO checking, wayne, 09:09
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 09:03
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 08:59
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, wayne, 08:30
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 08:19
- SPF HELO checking, wayne, 08:15
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, terry, 08:14
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 06:40
- Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, David Woodhouse, 02:41
December 09, 2004
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 23:47
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 17:38
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann, 17:36
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:01
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun, 16:58
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Greg Connor, 16:51
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Jonathan Gardner, 16:10
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 15:42
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun, 14:28
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann, 14:25
- Re: FTC summit now has presentations online, wayne, 14:14
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 12:14
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun, 12:04
- Re: license issues?, wayne, 11:58
- RE: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Bruce Barnes, 08:33
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann, 08:22
- RE: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 06:22
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Frank Ellermann, 02:54
- Re: Where is SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 02:31
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Frank Ellermann, 02:15
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann, 00:45
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, wayne, 00:25
December 08, 2004
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, william(at)elan.net, 23:42
- Re: The Role of the SPF council, Greg Connor, 22:47
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Meng Weng Wong, 19:23
- Re: Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, wayne, 18:56
- Not keeping state Was: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:22
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 15:42
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 15:41
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:31
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Roger Moser, 13:53
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Daniel Taylor, 13:41
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Meng Weng Wong, 12:39
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 12:26
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 11:31
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 11:30
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:26
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 11:22
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Daniel Taylor, 11:22
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 11:06
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 10:49
- The Role of the SPF council, wayne, 10:41
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:29
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Meng Weng Wong, 10:17
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., wayne, 10:13
- RE: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Scott Kitterman, 10:04
- RE: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Stuart D. Gathman, 09:56
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Daniel Taylor, 09:48
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 09:46
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Hannah Schroeter, 09:41
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Hannah Schroeter, 09:34
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., rogerk, 09:32
- Re: Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Hannah Schroeter, 09:25
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 09:19
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., william(at)elan.net, 09:11
- RE: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Scott Kitterman, 09:11
- FTC summit now has presentations online, wayne, 09:05
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Daniel Taylor, 09:01
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:52
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Roger Moser, 08:52
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne, 08:44
- What DB-Backed forwarding is., Daniel Taylor, 08:40
- RE: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:27
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 08:02
- Re: Where is SPF?, Ernesto Baschny, 07:25
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 06:12
- Re: Where is SPF?, Roger Moser, 05:47
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 05:33
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 04:42
- Re: Where is SPF?, Meng Weng Wong, 04:34
- Clean up this list, Richard Bang, 02:17
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Richard Bang, 01:56
December 07, 2004
- Re: SPF Statistics, James Couzens, 23:44
- Re: SPF Statistics, James Couzens, 23:13
- SPF Statistics, James Couzens, 22:41
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:34
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:30
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:23
- Re: Where is SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 18:59
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 18:18
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 17:44
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, william(at)elan.net, 17:21
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, william(at)elan.net, 16:42
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 16:25
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 16:23
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 16:08
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 16:05
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 16:01
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 16:01
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 15:42
- Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Frank Ellermann, 15:34
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:51
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 14:49
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- RE: Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Seth Goodman, 14:10
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 14:08
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 14:00
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 14:00
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 13:42
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Hannah Schroeter, 13:31
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Hannah Schroeter, 13:25
- Re: Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Hannah Schroeter, 13:13
- Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Hannah Schroeter, 13:09
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Daniel Taylor, 13:05
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 12:53
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 12:45
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 12:41
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 12:39
- Re: Re: help for allcomers, Hannah Schroeter, 12:27
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:14
- Re: license issues?, Hannah Schroeter, 12:08
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Greg Connor, 12:07
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:44
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 11:42
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 11:33
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 11:19
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 11:04
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:51
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 10:51
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 10:46
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:43
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Daniel Taylor, 10:41
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:36
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:25
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 10:11
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:00
- DomainKeys and IIM implementations (Was: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:26
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 09:05
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Richard Bang, 08:59
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Daniel Taylor, 08:59
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 08:58
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Scott Kitterman, 08:51
- RE: Where is SPF?, Scott Kitterman, 08:41
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 08:35
- Re: Where is SPF?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:28
- RE: Re[2]: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman, 08:28
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Scott Kitterman, 08:26
- Re: Where is SPF?, David Woodhouse, 08:23
- Re: Where is SPF?, John Hinton, 08:16
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 08:10
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Daniel Taylor, 08:04
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 08:01
- Re[4]: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Chris Drake, 07:37
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 07:21
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Richard Bang, 07:01
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:35
- Re: license issues?, william(at)elan.net, 06:03
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 06:01
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:57
- RE: Re[2]: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Stefan Engelbert, 05:51
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, william(at)elan.net, 05:43
- Re[2]: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Chris Drake, 05:42
- Re: license issues?, Mipam, 05:35
- RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Mark, 05:20
- license issues?, Mipam, 05:17
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:46
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Richard Bang, 03:55
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 03:40
- Re: can't get smtpd-policy to run, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:08
- can't get smtpd-policy to run, Mipam, 02:59
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, David Woodhouse, 02:56
- Re: Where is SPF?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:17
- Re: What Canada is doing ..., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:11
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 00:25
December 06, 2004
- Re: #spf IRC channel, jpinkerton, 23:54
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 23:03
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 22:55
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 21:23
- Re: Re: FairUCE, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:59
- Re: FairUCE, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:53
- Re: #spf IRC channel, Frank Ellermann, 19:52
- Re: FairUCE, Frank Ellermann, 19:19
- RE: #spf IRC channel, Guy, 16:19
- Re: FairUCE, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:36
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 15:35
- Re: #spf IRC channel, wayne, 14:50
- Re: FairUCE, rogerk, 14:12
- Re: #spf IRC channel, jpinkerton, 13:37
- Re: FairUCE, jpinkerton, 13:29
- Re: FairUCE, jpinkerton, 13:15
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 13:11
- Re: FairUCE, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:08
- Re: FairUCE, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:06
- Re: FairUCE, jpinkerton, 12:48
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 12:45
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 12:43
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 11:57
- Re: FairUCE, Pavel A. Zavyalov, 11:38
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, terry, 10:57
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 10:37
- Where is SPF?, John Hinton, 09:41
- RE: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Richard Bang, 09:38
- #spf IRC channel, wayne, 09:13
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Michael Hammer, 08:43
- What Canada is doing ..., John Glube, 07:04
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:40
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:27
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:09
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:29
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 01:16
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 00:30
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 00:03
December 05, 2004
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 22:51
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 18:39
- Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 17:48
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 17:39
- RE: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, John Glube, 17:03
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Mark, 16:50
- Re: help for allcomers, Frank Ellermann, 16:15
- Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Bourque Daniel, 16:04
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 14:36
- Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 14:12
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann, 13:55
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Chuck Mead, 12:42
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor, 12:40
- Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 12:34
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, william(at)elan.net, 12:23
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 12:15
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net, 11:56
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Chris Haynes, 11:30
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 11:03
- Re: help for allcomers, jpinkerton, 10:51
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 10:47
- Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, jpinkerton, 10:41
- Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Mark, 10:28
- Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne, 10:25
- FairUCE, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:20
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:40
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 06:54
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 06:30
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, william(at)elan.net, 06:08
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, jpinkerton, 03:17
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 02:33
December 04, 2004
- Re: op=s u b, Frank Ellermann, 18:45
- Re: ClassMates.com, terry, 18:14
- Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Frank Ellermann, 17:39
- Re: ClassMates.com, Frank Ellermann, 16:34
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 16:20
- Re: ClassMates.com, Roger B.A. Klorese, 16:02
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 16:02
- Re: ClassMates.com, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:00
- Re: ClassMates.com, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:56
- Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:47
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 14:00
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, jpinkerton, 13:51
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 13:38
- Re: op=s u b, Greg Connor, 13:33
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, Dave Crocker, 13:25
- RE: Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., Julian Mehnle, 12:59
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, william(at)elan.net, 12:54
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Chuck Mead, 12:47
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Roger B.A. Klorese, 12:34
- RE: For helping the helpless, Julian Mehnle, 12:34
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Chuck Mead, 12:31
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Roger B.A. Klorese, 12:20
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Greg Connor, 12:16
- Re: op=sub, Greg Connor, 12:10
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, Greg Connor, 11:58
- Re: Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Greg Connor, 10:17
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Greg Connor, 09:53
- Re: Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., william(at)elan.net, 08:25
- help for allcomers - WAS - re: djbdns is not free, jpinkerton, 07:16
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne, 07:02
- RE: re: djbdns is not free, terry, 06:52
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Mark Shewmaker, 05:49
- Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Mark Shewmaker, 05:19
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 05:17
- Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Frank Ellermann, 04:25
- Re: Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 04:21
- Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, jpinkerton, 04:12
- Re: Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., william(at)elan.net, 03:20
- Redefine Received-SPF: slightly., Mark Shewmaker, 02:17
December 03, 2004
- [meta] (was: djbdns is not free), Frank Ellermann, 22:28
- Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Frank Ellermann, 22:09
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 21:29
- op=sub, Frank Ellermann, 20:58
- Re: Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, wayne, 20:58
- Re: What to do about the SPF-classic I-D?, Frank Ellermann, 20:31
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, wayne, 20:23
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 18:34
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, Dave Crocker, 18:32
- RE: ClassMates.com, James Couzens, 17:44
- Re: ClassMates.com, James Couzens, 17:43
- Re: RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, wayne, 17:20
- Re: ClassMates.com, Meng Weng Wong, 16:12
- RE: ClassMates.com, Scott Kitterman, 15:57
- Re: ClassMates.com, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:52
- Re: ClassMates.com, Greg Connor, 15:51
- ClassMates.com, Hector Santos, 15:37
- Moved to SPF-DEVEL re: djbdns is not free, James Couzens, 14:26
- RE: re: djbdns is not free, Bashar AlAbdulhadi, 14:20
- Re: re: djbdns is not free, Chuck Mead, 13:32
- Re: re: djbdns is not free, Greg Connor, 13:31
- Re: re: djbdns is not free, James Couzens, 13:11
- RE: Re: [OT] djbdns is not free, James Couzens, 13:04
- Re: [OT] djbdns is not free, Greg Connor, 12:57
- RE: 90,000 host dDoS attack upon Chinese SPAM serve rs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:20
- Re: re: djbdns is not free END THREAD!, Chuck Mead, 11:43
- Re: re: djbdns is not free, James Couzens, 11:30
- Re: News on other anti-spam methods -- update, jpinkerton, 11:07
- Re: re: djbdns is not free, Jeroen Massar, 09:21
- re: djbdns is not free, James Couzens, 08:49
- RE: SPF Council Mailing List, terry, 08:19
- 90,000 host dDoS attack upon Chinese SPAM servers, James Couzens, 07:33
- RE: SPF Council Mailing List, Scott Kitterman, 07:06
- Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Frank Ellermann, 01:18
- RE: Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Seth Goodman, 01:02
- RFC 2821 and responsibility for forwarding, Andy Bakun, 00:19
December 02, 2004
- RE: Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., Andy Bakun, 20:58
- Re: [OT] djbdns is not free, william(at)elan.net, 17:47
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 15:16
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 15:14
- RE: Re: [OT] djbdns is not free, Bashar AlAbdulhadi, 14:59
- Re: Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., Frank Ellermann, 14:50
- Re: [OT] djbdns is not free, Frank Ellermann, 14:43
- [OT] djbdns is not free, 'Stephane Bortzmeyer', 13:45
- RE: Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Bashar AlAbdulhadi, 13:32
- RE: Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., Mark, 12:41
- Enhanced "source route", Stuart D. Gathman, 11:01
- Re: Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., Chuck Mead, 10:34
- Completion of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL., jpinkerton, 10:21
- News on other anti-spam methods ;-), jpinkerton, 10:09
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, David Woodhouse, 08:20
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Chris Haynes, 07:21
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, wayne, 01:11
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Greg Connor, 00:54
- Re: Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, Greg Connor, 00:00
December 01, 2004
- I have a new email address, wayne, 19:28
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, william(at)elan.net, 19:07
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, william(at)elan.net, 18:59
- Re: For helping the helpless, Frank Ellermann, 18:14
- Re: [ietf-clear] Re: Make CSV backwards compatible with legacy SPF records?, Matthew Elvey, 17:45
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, David Woodhouse, 17:26
- Re: Multiple header entries, Frank Ellermann, 17:17
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 16:53
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 16:21
- Re: FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, Frank Ellermann, 15:48
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Meng Weng Wong, 15:21
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 15:05
- Moratorium on discussiong certain subjects, wayne, 14:10
- Re: For helping the helpless, wayne, 13:45
- FYI: Return Path Rewriting (RPR) - Mail Forwarding in the Spam Age, william(at)elan.net, 13:42
- Re: Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:27
- RE: For helping the helpless, Brad Glore, 13:03
- For helping the helpless, jpinkerton, 12:50
- RE: Multiple header entries, Mark, 12:45
- RE: PTR problems, Greg Connor, 12:32
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Dave Crocker, 12:32
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 12:31
- RE: Multiple header entries, Scott Kitterman, 12:16
- RE: Multiple header entries, Mark, 12:09
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, David Woodhouse, 12:06
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 11:43
- Re: SPF Council Mailing List, wayne, 11:24
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 10:56
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 10:54
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Hannah Schroeter, 10:51
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne, 10:48
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 10:43
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 10:29
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 10:24
- RE: Multiple header entries, terry, 10:24
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Hannah Schroeter, 10:11
- RE: Multiple header entries, Mark, 10:10
- RE: Multiple header entries, Mark, 10:05
- Re: Re: Multiple header entries, william(at)elan.net, 09:51
- RE: Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Bashar AlAbdulhadi, 09:46
- Re: Broken SPF implementation, M Z R, 08:42
- RE: Broken SPF implementation, terry, 07:36
- Re: Re: Thoughts on the next steps for the council, wayne, 07:20
- Re: Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, jpinkerton, 06:30
- RE: PTR problems, Bruce Barnes, 05:40
- SPF at MIT spam conference this January?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:38
- RE: OT (was: Attacking Domain Keys), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:37
- Re: Multiple header entries, Frank Ellermann, 04:46
- Multiple header entries, Richard Bang, 03:02
- Antispam and MTA vendors that support SPF, Richard Bang, 02:58
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:24
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 02:01
- RE: Thoughts on the next steps for the council, Mark, 01:30