Re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it

I agree with Mark and Erik on this one.  We can't solve this working group's
charter by changing only the transport; we CAN solve this working group's
charter by changing only the message format.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Mark Crispin Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Erik E. Fair binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail), John C Klensin re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail), Mark Crispin re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail), John C Klensin ATTENTION! Re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail), Einar Stefferud Re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail), Paul A Vixie <= Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Erik E. Fair Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Mark Crispin Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD) Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Mark Crispin Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Erik E. Fair Re: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail, Keld J\|rn Simonsen

Re: binary transport vs 8bit character transport revisited (was: why it is a problem to transmit binary as binary in mail)