Re: Newline problem: Another stab

OK, you're right.  I overstated the case a little bit.  My real concern
is that  PERMITTING 0d0a to represent CRLF is opening a can of worms. 
The rest is a red herring.

How about a compromise in which we basically adopt Alain's proposal,
except we keep the old provision that CRLFs must be CRLFs, i.e. they
can't be represented by 0d0a in quoted-printable?  I believe that this
will solve all my practical objections.  -- Nathaniel