IETF 822 (date)
March 31, 1992
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Erik M. van der Poel, 21:55
- Re: archives, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 21:46
- archives, Randall Atkinson, 19:46
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 19:12
- Re: What to do with the charset and mnemonic documents, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 18:38
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 18:34
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 17:37
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:47
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, jknowles, 16:43
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 16:03
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 15:59
- What to do with the charset and mnemonic documents, Randall Atkinson, 15:17
- Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Walt Daniels, 14:17
- correction (Re: Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements), Keith Moore, 14:08
- Re: Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements, Keith Moore, 14:04
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, James M Galvin, 12:33
- Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Greg Vaudreuil, 12:23
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, david, 11:37
- Re: Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements, Dave Crocker, 09:18
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, Greg Vaudreuil, 08:36
- Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, Greg Vaudreuil, 08:25
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 01:13
March 30, 1992
- Re: Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements, Bob Smart, 19:33
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 19:15
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 19:05
- Re: Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements, Dave Crocker, 18:20
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, John C Klensin, 13:29
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:54
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Marshall Rose, 12:27
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, John C Klensin, 11:37
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Larry Masinter, 09:24
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Robert L. Howard, 08:09
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:52
- Re: ps;1 or ps -- problems with the postscript application type, John C Klensin, 07:35
- Re: ps;1 or ps -- problems with the postscript application type, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 06:22
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 01:38
March 27, 1992
- re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Larry Masinter, 22:40
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Bill Janssen, 20:47
- Re: ps;1 or ps -- problems with the postscript application type, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 20:10
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Marshall Rose, 20:06
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 19:34
- TIFF / GIF / PostScript / EPS..., Blake C. Ramsdell, 18:28
- re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Mark Crispin, 18:19
- Transport involvement in Delivery Acknowledgements, Bob Smart, 18:08
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Keith Moore, 17:34
- ps;1 or ps -- problems with the postscript application type, Larry Masinter, 15:36
- mime formats and versions in format specifications, Larry Masinter, 15:19
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 13:03
- Re: showstopper on RFC-MIME, Russ Hobby, 12:47
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 12:37
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Keith Moore, 12:23
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 10:36
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 10:30
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Dave Crocker, 09:07
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, John C Klensin, 07:53
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:41
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Nathaniel Borenstein, 05:58
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 05:51
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 05:50
- Re: Can we move the ack discussion to ietf-ack?, Keith Moore, 03:11
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 02:44
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 02:07
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 01:13
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 00:13
March 26, 1992
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 23:43
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Tim Kehres, 23:34
- Can we move the ack discussion to ietf-ack?, Tim Kehres, 23:10
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Bob Smart, 19:47
- Re: Request for an 11th hour change, Marshall Rose, 18:41
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Dave Crocker, 17:29
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Laurence Lundblade, 16:40
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Keith Moore, 16:29
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 16:25
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Dave Crocker, 16:13
- Re: Request for an 11th hour change, Valdis Kletnieks, 15:56
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 15:51
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Dave Crocker, 15:36
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 15:35
- Re: Request for an 11th hour change, jknowles, 15:32
- Re: Request for an 11th hour change, Dave Crocker, 15:23
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:52
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Keith Moore, 14:43
- Re: Text "attachments" to messages, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:26
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:22
- Re: MIME types for ack[-request]?, Dave Crocker, 14:16
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Valdis Kletnieks, 13:59
- Re: Request for an 11th hour change, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:24
- Request for an 11th hour change, Marshall Rose, 13:18
- MIME types for ack[-request]?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:27
- Re: Procedural question: Future MIME types, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:18
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Greg Vaudreuil, 10:30
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Keld J|rn Simonsen, 10:16
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Einar Stefferud, 09:50
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Dan Oscarsson, 05:58
- Re: Working Group LAST CALL....., Keld J|rn Simonsen, 05:03
March 24, 1992
- Re: Procedural question: Future MIME types, Dave Crocker, 13:53
- Re: One More Change, Greg Vaudreuil, 13:23
- One More Change, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:10
- Procedural question: Future MIME types, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:30
- Re: UPDATED MIME DRAFT, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:15
- Re: UPDATED MIME DRAFT, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 08:01
March 10, 1992
- Re: JUNET & Mnemonic and racism, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 16:46
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, John C Klensin, 16:23
- Re: NETF conclusions on MIME and Mnemonic, Bill Janssen, 15:05
- re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Mark Crispin, 15:03
- Re: NETF conclusions on MIME and Mnemonic, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 14:34
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 14:01
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Piet . Beertema, 13:32
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Valdis Kletnieks, 10:07
- Re: NETF conclusions on MIME and Mnemonic, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:23
- Re: Wrong Model (was Re: Alternative view of some aspects of MIME), Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 07:38
- NETF conclusions on MIME and Mnemonic, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:49
- Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Markku Savela, 03:41
- Re: JUNET & Mnemonic and racism, Mark Crispin, 01:51
March 09, 1992
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, jknowles, 16:43
- Wrong Model (was Re: Alternative view of some aspects of MIME), Bob Smart, 16:33
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Mark Crispin, 15:54
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, jknowles, 14:19
- Re: Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies, Steve Hardcastle-Kille, 07:22
- Re: Alternative view of some aspects of MIME, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 02:25
March 06, 1992
- Alternative view of some aspects of MIME, Bob Smart, 18:27
- Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies, Bob Miles, 10:38
- PS -- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:01
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:59
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 05:51
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Erik M. van der Poel, 03:32
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 00:25
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 00:24
March 05, 1992
- The newline solution 8-), Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 07:12
- CLOSURE NOW! Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:48
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 06:26
- A conversion between MIME and X.400/88, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:37
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 02:11
March 04, 1992
- mnemonics, Erik M. van der Poel, 19:53
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Dave Crocker, 18:20
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 17:10
- Re: Join the IETF mailing list!, Einar Stefferud, 15:49
- CLOSURE NOW! Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Einar Stefferud, 15:39
- Re: WG Status (Re: Join the IETF mailing list!), Greg Vaudreuil, 11:44
- Re: WG Status (Re: Join the IETF mailing list!), Keld J|rn Simonsen, 11:11
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:07
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Keld J|rn Simonsen, 10:59
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:30
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 09:15
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 08:18
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:36
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 05:16
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 03:19
- Re: WG Status (Re: Join the IETF mailing list!), Erik M. van der Poel, 01:19
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Keith Moore, 00:01
March 03, 1992
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Christopher Davis, 20:24
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Nathaniel Borenstein, 19:55
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Edward Vielmetti, 19:44
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Erik M. van der Poel, 19:32
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Nathaniel Borenstein, 19:03
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein, 18:56
- Re: Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Dave Crocker, 17:33
- Re: More problems with "mnemonic" (sic), Keld J|rn Simonsen, 16:30
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Keith Moore, 14:56
- Re: More problems with "mnemonic" (sic), Randall Atkinson, 13:35
- Showstopper from EUnet for RFC-MIME, Ted Lindgreen, 11:34
- Re: Newline problem: Another stab, Dave Crocker, 10:53
- Re: More problems with "mnemonic" (sic), Keld J|rn Simonsen, 10:33
- Re: The newlines problem..., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 10:12
- More problems with "mnemonic" (sic), Randall Atkinson, 08:14
- Newline problem: Another stab, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:47
March 02, 1992
- Re: The newlines problem..., Erik M. van der Poel, 20:56
- Re: Join the IETF mailing list!, Randall Atkinson, 18:19
- Re: The newlines problem..., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 15:17
- WG Status (Re: Join the IETF mailing list!), Greg Vaudreuil, 14:00
- Re: Join the IETF mailing list!, Einar Stefferud, 13:16
- MIME closure, Dave Crocker, 12:44
- Join the IETF mailing list!, Greg Vaudreuil, 10:25
- Re: external reference to compressed postscript file, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:09
- Re: The newlines problem..., Erik M. van der Poel, 04:31
- Re: Ambiguity in 'body part'., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 02:18
- Re: The newlines problem..., Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - UCL), 01:58