Please re-read what was said. The reasons given -- so few Japanese, and
Well, perhaps I misinterpreted the grammar. I'll accept that, but my
statement still stands. And let me add that I believe the lack of protest
was not because of happiness with the IESG decision, but because it seemed
useless to complain.
I will consider it a show-stopper if mnemonic is reinserted without an
IESG-
acceptable citation but ISO-2022-JP is not.
As will the vast majority of the working group. I see zero chance of this
happening.
I see no reason to coddle the racist attitude that European languages are
important but East Asian languages are not.
This is certainly an offensive idea. Are you claiming that someone has
advanced this?
Jim