[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Minutes of the RFC 822extensions WG in Columbus

1993-04-12 09:59:11
< To reach closure, let me observe that the proposal I made for using the
< encoded word to pass non-ascii filenames is one which does not have to be
< implemented in this version of the MIME document.  If it is truly backward
< compatable, then when and if the use of richer-than-ascii characters begin
< to see widespread use, the access types can be refined in a separate
< document.  Resolving the issue now may only have the effect of delaying a
< solid, useful, extensible and needed protocol.

Would adding in the use of an encoded word have to delay the document?

                                        Tony Hansen
                                att!pegasus!hansen, attmail!tony