Ned,
---- Included message:
> I wonder whether such data would not be better classed under
> Content-type: Text?
It is a judgement call the registrar of the type has to make. However, I
don't know what subtypes you are referring to. Would you care to elaborate?
Well, STIF is not a distinct type, but PCI uses STIF and I chose to class it
as Content-type:Text on the theory that humans ought to be quite comforable
reading the stuff. (That was, after all, a design goal for STIF.)
The spec for Signature uses Application.
Those are the two that pop to mind immediatley. If I foraged, I'd probably
come up with more. Lots of conversations have also triggered this question.
d/