IETF 822 (date)

IETF 822 (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

October 31, 1993

Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, rhys, 21:42
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Rick Troth, 21:15
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, rhys, 16:17
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Patrik Faltstrom, 15:01
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Dana S Emery, 11:28
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Nathaniel Borenstein, 04:41

October 30, 1993

Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, rhys, 16:23
MIME content type reviews, John C Klensin, 14:00
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, John C Klensin, 13:27
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Rick Troth, 10:52
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Rick Troth, 10:48
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Rick Troth, 10:37
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, John C Klensin, 09:29
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Dana S Emery, 09:15

October 29, 1993

RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 22:58
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, John Gardiner Myers, 20:02
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, rhys, 15:42
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Bill Janssen, 15:07
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Rick Troth, 14:01
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 13:29
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, John Gardiner Myers, 13:10
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Dana S Emery, 13:07
MIME Content subtype reviews agendas, KLENSIN, 11:25
TIS/PEM Version 6.1 now available, James M Galvin, 11:06
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Tim Berners-Lee, 09:45
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Tim Berners-Lee, 09:33
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Rick Troth, 09:19
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 07:26
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Jim Conklin, 06:35
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 05:36

October 28, 1993

RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 21:54
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 21:27
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, John Gardiner Myers, 17:31
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, John C Klensin, 17:02
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 12:05
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Rick Troth, 08:17
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ed Levinson, 08:10
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Jim Conklin, 08:00
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Rick Troth, 07:57
Re: comments on SHAVE, Chris Adie, 07:22
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom, 03:02

October 27, 1993

RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 23:38
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 23:31
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 18:28
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 17:20
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 17:00
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 16:42
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 16:24
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 16:18
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 15:13
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 15:13
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd), 14:55
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, rhys, 13:50
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:06
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom, 13:05
Re: Text/enriched ambiguity, beyond!eng!tcrowley, 12:26
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 12:05
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Jim Conklin, 07:38
Text/enriched ambiguity, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:26
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 07:10
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:30
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 06:17
Re: EDI Mime body part, Dave Crocker, 06:04
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom, 01:00

October 26, 1993

RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 23:19
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 22:53
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 22:29
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Bill Janssen, 22:04
Re: EDI Mime body part, Ned Freed, 21:43
Re: EDI Mime body part, Mark Grand, 21:36
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 20:41
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 19:45
RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 19:45
Re: EDI Mime body part, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:19
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 15:50
Re: EDI Mime body part, Mark Grand, 15:30
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 14:06
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 12:11
Unsubscribe, Keith Marchington, 11:08
Subscribe, Keith Marchington, 11:05
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Stephen D Crocker, 10:45
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom, 10:03
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 09:44
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ed Levinson, 09:12
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 08:51
Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 08:16
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:00
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:52
Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, CHRIS R BARTRAM, 06:57
EDI Mime body part, Dave Crocker, 06:29
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 05:49
RE: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Ned Freed, 01:37
RE: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Ned Freed, 01:32
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed, 01:04

October 25, 1993

comments on SHAVE, Keith Moore, 22:10
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 19:21
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 19:03
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 18:52
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 18:43
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 18:26
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 17:36
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 17:01
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner, 15:04
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore, 14:34
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker, 14:16
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:37
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Dave Crocker, 11:12
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Ned Freed, 10:39
Re: Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Steve Dorner, 09:29
Query on a nit: Application vs. Text conten-type, Dave Crocker, 07:12

October 24, 1993

yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, moore, 21:13

October 21, 1993

MIME-PEM Interaction Specification, James M Galvin, 13:58

October 20, 1993

Announcement of Open Applications Area Meeting, Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV), 01:59

October 19, 1993

Application/Signature, Greg Vaudreuil, 17:37

October 18, 1993

Re: Re MIME/SGML, Ed Levinson, 07:33

October 17, 1993

Re MIME/SGML, Terry Allen, 09:54
(ignore if posted), Terry Allen, 08:41

October 03, 1993

EMail World Conference Update, DCIGAVIN, 10:11