Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts

Yes, this bothered me about multipart/header-set.  I had exactly the
same reaction as Ned:  ``I find all of these proposals to be contrary to
what I see as the MIME philosophy''.  I'd like to read multipart/related
again, though.

Bill

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, (continued) Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Bill Janssen <= Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ed Levinson Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Rick Troth Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, CHRIS R BARTRAM Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Stephen D Crocker Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed