Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts

Steve,

Thanks for sending the verification query.  All of the details in your note
were exactly correct and therefore combine with my original note, I think,
to explain the suggestion.

Dave

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, (continued) Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Bill Janssen Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ed Levinson Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Rick Troth Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, CHRIS R BARTRAM Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Stephen D Crocker Re: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker <= RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker