RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts

  If one is using MIME to pass around material in which there's
considerable internal structure, such as Hypercard stacks or HTML (for
example), why isn't it better to register and use the specific application
rather than to try to make MIME itself handle that level of complexity?

Jim

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, (continued) RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Dave Crocker RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Rick Troth Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Jim Conklin <= Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Keith Moore Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Patrik Faltstrom Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd) RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ed Levinson Re: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, John C Klensin RE: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, rhys RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Steve Dorner RE: Re[2]: yet another way to indicate related MIME body parts, Ned Freed