Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME

I am ashamed to admit I failed to look in the media-types file that the
IANA keeps before making my claim. Ok, so I will start using the
application/wordperfect5.1 etc.

One thing I noted while looking through the media-types file, is that
there was no mention of text/enriched which I seem to remember was now
prefered above tect/richtext?

Anyone out there who cares to enlighten me on this?

Erik

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, (continued) Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Harald . T . Alvestrand Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Steve Dorner Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Keith Moore Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV) Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Ned Freed Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Masataka Ohta Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV) Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Jim Conklin Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Dave Crocker Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Ned Freed Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV) <=

Previous by Date:	Re: NULL, Patrik Faltstrom
Next by Date:	Re: NULL, Masataka Ohta
Previous by Thread:	Re: unregistered subtypes in MIME, Ned Freed
Next by Thread:	Re: About C-T-Es and transports (Re: NULL), Steve Dorner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]