jcr(_at_)pegasus(_dot_)att(_dot_)com writes:
I am somewhat confused by the Content-Disposition header discussion.
There is an existing RFC draft that defines mapping between MIME and the
X.400 file transfer extended body part (draft-freed-ftbp-00.txt) - and
it defines the header "Content-Pathname:" to hold the X.400 pathname
attribute. This attribute is nothing more than the file name and
(optional) path.
Rens' and Steve's draft proposes placing the file name in the
Content-Disposition header along with information on presentation.
It looks like two places have been defined to hold what is essentially
the same information.
Make that 3 now -
orginal MIME draft, Content-Type: name=
draft-freed-ftbp-00.txt, Content-Disposition: filename=
x.400 rfc draft, Content-Pathname:
What a mess.
--Dan
--
Dan Grillo dan_grillo(_at_)next(_dot_)com (415) 780-2963 now in building 1
Objects in calendar are closer than they appear