[Top] [All Lists]

Re: C-D: Attachment Clarification

1995-01-18 01:42:20
I would suggest that you have shown the need for a new type of

content-disposition: attachment-represented-by-inline-icon

Let's do that as a registered disposition type once the basic
content-disposition is out of the door.

BTW: will you suggest the use of the ietf-types(_at_)uninett(_dot_)no list for
the discussion of new content-dispositions, as is now done for
content-types? (It ended up after a long and confusing
journey from RFC 1590. Send to ietf-types-request(_at_)uninett(_dot_)no to join)

             harald A

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>