At 09.00 -0400 01-09-26, Keith Moore wrote:
yes, but this really does cause a problem, as the set of
"obvious" field names for some purpose is rather small, and
there is a tendency for the "obvious" field names to get
usurped by naive implementations.
Are you really sure of this? English is a rich language.
See for example the following header field names:
Obsoletes/Replaces/Supersedes, which all are variants
of the same thing.
--
Jacob Palme <jpalme(_at_)dsv(_dot_)su(_dot_)se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/jpalme/