Keith Moore wrote:
Doing so directly
sanctions the sort of behaviour that has created the need for this
document to begin with.
that's a silly statement. it's one thing to insist that mail responders
minimize potential harm, quite another to insist that they use one
particular mechanism which is known to not work adequately in practice.
Two wrongs, and all of that.
The kind of people who reject <> are not going to comply with this
specification anyway. They're neither the intended nor expected audience.
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/