Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047


Keith Moore wrote:

I agree that 2047 is not suitable for this purpose.  My guess is that
the IDNA stuff is the best starting point.


draft-faerber-i18n-email-netnews-names-00.txt contains a proposal
for newsgroup names based on IDNA.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, (continued) Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Alan Barrett <= Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Keith Moore Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Charles Lindsey Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Dave Crocker Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', D. J. Bernstein Re: ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', Keith Moore Re: ``ASCII-compatible'' does not mean ``7-bit'', Dave Crocker

Previous by Date:	Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Andrew Gierth
Next by Date:	Re: Historical trivia, Nick Shelness
Previous by Thread:	Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Russ Allbery
Next by Thread:	Re: UTF-8 over RFC 2047, Bruce Lilly
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]