Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?
2003-09-26 07:13:24
moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu (Keith Moore) writes:
If the spec is too hard to support properly, implementations will not
contain proper support. IMO that is then a failure of the
specification. Is MIME too hard? Arguably, yes, in parts. For
example,
it doesn't take a moron to overlook one of the content-disposition
RFCs. How many programs get filename encoding wrong? (I suspect I do,
come to think of it.)
what do people think - would a MIME roadmap document be worth the
trouble of writing?
Yes - I'd very much like to have one.
I'd love to have something I could show people to get them up to speed
and into the conversation with all the parts they need. Of course, I'd
have to get myself up to speed first!
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Message not available
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Bruce Lilly
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, ned+ietf-822
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Arnt Gulbrandsen
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Bruce Lilly
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Jacob Palme
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Keith Moore
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Jacob Palme
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Keith Moore |
Next by Date: |
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Dave Crocker |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Dual names, IDN and ASCII, in e-mail addresses?, Keith Moore |
Next by Thread: |
MIME roadmap (was Re: Dual names [...] in e-mail addresses?), Abhijit Menon-Sen |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|