Re: 2 MIME questions re: message/rfc822

Keith Moore writes:
> > > no.  you shouldn't be expected to hide useful information for the 
> > > recipient just so that the mail system will be transparent.
> > Agreed. But IMO, the list processor software is a recipient as far as 
> > the internet mail system is concerned. (You get a final delivery DSN 
> > when the message is delivered to the mailing list processor.)
> okay, I'll grant that.  but if the list processor is going to alter 
> the message, it needs to consider the effect this has on digital 
> signatures.
For a valid message I certainly agree. But I think the case is far 
weaker for a syntactically invalid message.
If it works, fine. If not, that's a pity. Maybe add another test case if 
the problem seems worth a workaround.
Arnt