[Top] [All Lists]

RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues

2005-03-08 06:34:21

Thanks for the update.  I need to work out a procedural issue with Harald
(he's still holding a discuss on 2234), but I can do that.  I'll keep you


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net] 
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:11 PM
To: Scott Hollenbeck
Cc: Patrik Fdltstrvm; ietf-822; Paul Overell; Rob Cameron; 
Chris Newman; Julian Reschke; Bill Fenner; Ned Freed / 822; 
Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Dave Crocker; Sandro Mazzucato; Pete 
Resnick; Brian Bidulock; iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues
Importance: High

 On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:41 -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:

  It's too late to submit the ABNF revision as an I-D, until after
  Minneapolis, but here is a pointer to the revision:


  ; <>

  As noted in the Acknowledgements section, Julian Reschke gets a very big
  THANKS! for converting the source to xml.  I've tweaked it only a bit.



I believe ABNF is done, which is to say that it is ready for Draft.

1. The revised spec is at the above location, obviously needing formal i-d
submission after this week.

2. All of the outstanding items, concerning the document, pertain to
enhancements, rather than to 'fixing bugs in the spec'.  Although most or
all of the enhancements are reasonable, they would require re-cycling at
Proposed.  In response to my queries about whether to recycle vs. go to
draft, the overwhelming preference, is for moving to Draft.  Hence, no
enhancements to abnf have been done.

So I believe you may continue processing the specification for Draft status.

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 dcrocker  a t ...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>