DISCUSS is cleared now. Scott will deal with the formalities.
--On 8. mars 2005 08:34 -0500 Scott Hollenbeck <sah(_at_)428cobrajet(_dot_)net>
Thanks for the update. I need to work out a procedural issue with Harald
(he's still holding a discuss on 2234), but I can do that. I'll keep you
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:11 PM
To: Scott Hollenbeck
Cc: Patrik Fdltstrvm; ietf-822; Paul Overell; Rob Cameron;
Chris Newman; Julian Reschke; Bill Fenner; Ned Freed / 822;
Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Dave Crocker; Sandro Mazzucato; Pete
Resnick; Brian Bidulock; iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:41 -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> It's too late to submit the ABNF revision as an I-D, until after
> Minneapolis, but here is a pointer to the revision:
As noted in the Acknowledgements section, Julian Reschke gets a very
big THANKS! for converting the source to xml. I've tweaked it only a
I believe ABNF is done, which is to say that it is ready for Draft.
1. The revised spec is at the above location, obviously needing formal i-d
submission after this week.
2. All of the outstanding items, concerning the document, pertain to
enhancements, rather than to 'fixing bugs in the spec'. Although most or
all of the enhancements are reasonable, they would require re-cycling at
Proposed. In response to my queries about whether to recycle vs. go to
draft, the overwhelming preference, is for moving to Draft. Hence, no
enhancements to abnf have been done.
So I believe you may continue processing the specification for Draft
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net