At 5:47 PM -0700 3/14/03, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> What would you call it when spam software adds headers that make it
look like the message was sent by a particular email client?
If the intent is fraudulent, then it is "forgery." Otherwise it
Well then we've just moved the question off to a different level and
have to define "fraudulent". In this case obviously they are doing
it to try and trick spam filters--but that's not technically
fraudlent.
> I'd replace "filters or rejects" with "categorizes or rejects" to
> avoid the self-reference.
That would be fine, except that I'm trying to appeal to the standard
meaning of "filter" and fight the common use of "filter" in spam
circles to mean either "wonderful" or "garbage" depending on prejudices.
How about
mail filter: any mechanism that filters by rejecting or discarding ...
The only thing that I see as confusing is that some people use filter
to mean "decide to accept or discard" and others mean "decide to file
in the good pile or the bad pile". I think we've seen some of that
confusion here.
How about "malicious forgery filter" to make clear it is intended to
be looking for malicious nonsense instead of innocent and proper
apparent inconsistencies such as legitimate differences between envelope
sender and reverse DNS name?
That sounds good to me.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.puremessaging.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg