Re: [Asrg] Giving Public Notice ....

On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:04:43 EST, Jason Hihn said:
> Well, I prefer tech to legal-ese.. It's just my nature. I don't doubt that
> you could make things scary and binding enough (legally speaking), but I
> want it backed up with technical measures. I want sender tracability incase
> they do send spam anyway. Then you get in a whole  new can of worms working
> out ways on how you can verify the sender is legit and traceable. Then you
> have to be able to make that determination in real-time while you still have
> them on a socket, before you accept the message.
The guys at cluelessmailers estimated that some 90% of the problem is the
result of only 100 to 150 people.  Now if we took up a collection of $500 from
every ISP that has a inbound spam problem, and hired a few "enforcers" from
any one of several ethnically-based entrepreneur organizations that work 
somewhat
outside conventional legality, and had them "explain our position" to the
offenders, I'd not be surprised if a lot of spammers took the hint

Or we could just hire a few RIAA lawyers - *THEY* don't seem to have *ANY*
trouble in tracking down miscreants....

Some days, I can't tell which of the two solutions is which... ;)

pgpV8kDGlEWPl.pgp
Description: PGP signature