UK law requires every business to list on its letterhead its
registered office at which service can be effected.
But ( and you'll correct me if I'm wrong ) not all spammers are
businesses, and even when they are, setting up a business for the Xmas
season and closing it in January is still legal. Where's your process
server when the goods fall apart in two months, despite Consumer
Protection laws?
If you are a slave to an ideology you become an idiot.
Phill
Mate, I couldn't agree more.
I still get this feeling that altering the behaviour of spammers in the
long term won't happen by changing the RFCs, however much I'm willing to
try it because I have to hope it is possible to improve on what we have.
But I'd be willing to bet my $.02 that "judging intent" of email whether
by content or "authorised source" will turn out to be beyond a Computer,
particularly without mucking things up for the billion clueless users who
WANT to send anything anywhere quickly.
On with the show!
Regards,
tom.
__________________________________________________
Security Consultant/Analyst
CSC
Ph: +61 8 9429 6478 Email: tcleary2(_at_)csc(_dot_)com(_dot_)au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email, including any attachments, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or personal information and
may also be the subject of legal privilege. Any personal information
contained in this email is not to be used or disclosed for any purpose
other than the purpose for which you have received it. If you are not the
intended recipient, you must not disclose or use the information contained
in it. In this case, please let me know by return email, delete the
message permanently from your system and destroy any copies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg