This is good. I can see we will have several definitions of spam and we
need to. Spam is many things and certain technologies will have
strengths and weaknesses against each of those definitions. Once we have
a list of definitions we feel good about it will be much easier to
evaluate the the solutions.
Here's mine:
Spam is transmission of mass email without the prior explicit
authorization of the recipient.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[mailto:brunner(_at_)nic-naa(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Barry Shein
Cc: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; brunner(_at_)nic-naa(_dot_)net
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
Barry,
This doesn't (yet) identify the economic issue(s).
If the definition doesn't make the DMA scream, it should.
It is also source-centric (and we know that sources "twinkle").
Eric
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg