Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
At 03:20 PM 6/4/2003 -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> ...
> ok..optional headers or do we introduce a new one? There isn't an
RFC 2822
> registration process that I am aware of.
See draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-06.txt
Currently, isn't it enough just to define a header in an RFC? This has
been done for a number of headers.
Yes, that's all that should be needed: write an internet-draft defining
the new header and get it published as an RFC. If msghdr-registry gets
published as an RFC before this new I-D gets published as an RFC, then
the new I-D will also need to have an appropriate IANA Considerations
section that directs IANA to add the new header to the header registry.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg