At 5:30 PM -0400 2003/08/13, Chris Lewis wrote:
Agree tho, should mention "bounded exponential backoff". I've fudged
the original a bit.
You don't necessarily have to mention "bounded exponential
backoff" per se. Maybe better would be to say that the method should
be adaptive, with increasingly longer timeouts for repeat offenses.
You could then mention "bounded exponential backoff" as one example
of such a method.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad(_dot_)knowles(_at_)skynet(_dot_)be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg