ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] 6. Email Path Verification (hashcash benchmarks)

2003-09-14 19:44:34
At 2:06 AM +0100 2003/09/15, Jonathan Morton wrote:

 I personally think that nearly all ISPs, especially those with a
 large proportion of newbies, should delete directly-executable
 attachments without question.

There, I must disagree very strongly. Plenty of people in this world have reason to be mailing attachments around, although I'm opposed to their using e-mail as a replacement for proper file-transfer technologies for large attachments.

Yes, I agree that there should be some default controls to make this sort of stuff less dangerous, but I am most certainly not convinced that they should be deleting directly executable attachments unless expressly asked to do so.


        This would be a good topic for coverage in the BCP for service 
providers.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad(_dot_)knowles(_at_)skynet(_dot_)be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>