Well I suppose but isn't there some way of effectively wildcarding?
Can't they just set it up so...ok, "it"...SPF yes, easy anyhow, DK no
because they have to work on each msg, but hell someone will just
stick that in whatever they use for a mail server. It's not like it's
saying a lot, just that slug(_at_)cable-098390(_dot_)crackhouse(_dot_)com is
one of
ours.
Maybe some of this stuff needs more analysis in terms of
non-cooperative or even anti-cooperative participants. How many times
do we need to beaten over the head with *that* fact?
I know...just blacklist miscreant isps...we see how well that's worked
thus far.
On May 19, 2004 at 21:32 sethb(_at_)panix(_dot_)com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> top-posted:
Well, everyone keeps saying this but I don't particularly see why this
should be the case. I'm sure some, even many, such ISPs will do as you
say but are you really going to vouchsafe for all those broadband and
dialup ISPs currently a source of so many problems?
The ones that are too fucking cheap, stupid, and/or lazy to do
anything about their infected lusers spamming and emitting worms?
They're going to go to a lot of extra effort to allow their idiot
lusers to spam? I don't think so.
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs(_at_)TheWorld(_dot_)com |
http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo*
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg