Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions
2004-12-23 15:17:00
push the message storage to the user end (where it probably ought to be)
Why is that?
1) Scaleability. There is far more aggregate processing power and aggregate
disk space available within the user community to store messages than within
any
of the ISPs own data centers.
2) Cost. Both disk space and CPU cycles are probably cheaper at most end-user
machines, too... most users probably have cheap(er) IDE disk drives, while many
ISPs could be using RAID arrays or (more likely) mirrored SCSI drives, which
are
generally more expensive per gig than end-user stuff is. By the same token,
high-end high-performance server systems usually cost more per CPU cycle than
cheaper end-user-grade stuff does. So not only is it CHEAPER in total for
storage and processing at the user end, but user=end processing is INFINITELY
easier from the ISP perspective, since it's then the user's pocketbook paying
for it.
3) Responsibility. Once the message is handed off to the destination user,
the
ISP no longer has to worry about it. If they hang onto it, they have to still
worry about backups, possible restoration, improper access, loss due to system
crashes, fire, natural disasters, intrustion, etc etc.
4) Control. Once the user has picked up their E-mail, what they do with it
after that is THEIR OWN choice, and the ISP simply isn't involved. The user
can
process, store, delete, reroute, or whatever else they want... and if they want
to let 200Gb of mail stack up in their Inbox, because that style suits them,
they can do so. The ISP doesn't have to care anymore.
Gordon Peterson http://personal.terabites.com/
1977-2002 Twenty-fifth anniversary year of Local Area Networking!
Support free and fair US elections! http://stickers.defend-democracy.org
12/19/98: Partisan Republicans scornfully ignore the voters they "represent".
12/09/00: the date the Republican Party took down democracy in America.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Mailing lists, John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2 <=
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Hannigan, Martin
|
|
|