I'm sorry, this repartee' has exceeded its shelf expiration date.
-b
On December 30, 2004 at 21:54 sethb(_at_)panix(_dot_)com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> wrote:
On December 21, 2004 at 20:05 sethb(_at_)panix(_dot_)com (Seth Breidbart)
wrote:
Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> top-posted:
So what you're saying is that anyone with a broadband connection
should be prevented from delivering email directly.
Actually, he wrote that ISPs should indicate which IP addresses are in
use by customers, and which by mailservers. It's up to anybody else
to use that information as they choose; it isn't a Port 25 block.
You're just detailing that distinction to us because you think it
makes you look intelligent? I don't understand why you bother.
No, I'm specifying the distinction because blocking Port 25 is
objected to, for what can be considered good reason. (The customer
says he paid for Internet access, not blocked Internet access.)
Many disagree with blocking Port 25. I haven't seen anyone disagree
with the providing of accurate information.
Are you trying to be helpful, or do you just like to type?
The former. And you?
Seth
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg