ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Re: bounces, and anit-spam principles

2007-01-23 07:17:53


On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Dave Crocker wrote:



Tony Finch wrote:
<gep2(_at_)terabites(_dot_)com> wrote:
2.  Accordingly, the definition of what they do and do not
want MUST be such that the RECIPIENT defines it... not the
IETF, not the sender's ISP, not the recipient's ISP, nor
some governmental body, nor anybody else.

Most users prefer to delegate this job. It's 10x more efficient
to do so.


Not to quibble, but I would have guessed several orders of magnitude greater.

Probably more.

Also, for most of the world's 1+ billion users, I'd have added "effective" to "efficient"...

d/

Among other problems with individually maintained spamblocks is the difficulty in rehabilitating a legitimate address (ip or domain) after
it has been widely blocked for prior bad behavior.

Forbidding cooperation or delegation is a spammer's trick.

Daniel Feenberg


--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg