ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

2008-04-02 20:27:36
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
J D Falk wrote:
Chris Lewis thought:

  
der Mouse wrote:
    
 [ . . . ]
  
Might I suggest DNSL, then, instead of DNSBL?
      
 That, is one of the thoughts I had.
    
This is a Best Current Practices document, and thus we've already been
through arguments about intorducing new practices that aren't currently
in widespread use.  Shouldn't we similarly avoid introducing new /words/
that aren't currently in widespread use?
_______________________________________________
  

Well ya know I've seen DNSBL = DNS Based List as well as DNS Black List 
and DNS Block List.... and you know what for ages I thought the original 
definition was DNS Based List (just because that is exactly what it is).

My other thought was exactly that - explicitly use the "based list" 
definition, note/acknowledge the variations of "B" in common usage, and 
briefly enumerate the other types of "based list" (DNSWL etc), mention 
scoring etc.

That's similar to what I did with the terms "spam", "velveeta", "jello" 
when I wrote the usenet spam FAQ back in 1994.  That document introduced 
new terms that are used til this day (and nobody's used "velveeta" or 
"jello" since then, thank heavens.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>