On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:27:32PM -0700, David Cawley wrote:
Personally, I like the idea of defining DNSBL as DNS Based List as
it simply implies list data served up via DNS and it's generic enough
to encompass the various flavors - RHSBL's, URIBL's etc.
I concur with this, and suggest that perhaps using it would avoid the
necessity of getting into the alphabet soup of all the other terms.
Given that the whole point of using "DNSBL" is that it's a known and
recognised acronym, redefining it to mean something entirely different
seems to miss that point?
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg