John Levine wrote:
I suggested test instead of dnsbl.test as it's less likely to be
parsed as a URL.
Not a bad idea.
Dunno, the author of I-D.asrg-dnsbl rejected "test" proposals
so far. You could also argue that when 127.0.0.2 is under the
control of the opposition the DNBL user has more interesting
problems than DNSBL test entries.
Frank
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg