Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops)
2008-11-17 20:45:40
The post office can do postage because it alone offers the service and
can verify the postage, whether you print it or not.
In email, how will this work? Who does the verification? If it's the
recipient system, this is NOTHING LIKE postage, which is verified by the
sending transport. If it's the sending system in email, then as a
spammer, I'd just not do that check. The post office provides a
centralized service, whereas email goes about its business without any
such centralization or agreements between POs of different countries.
Same goes for telephone service that was used before as a poor analogy.
You keep saying they are all arguments against postage are "strawmen,"
which itself is tiring of you, but why don't you do a bit more research
on it and propose something substantially thought out and then we can
discuss it.
Clearly these pointless emails we're sending are not moving the idea
forward in your opinion, and certainly they are not in mine, so more
details need to be worked out before you bring it up for discussion.
Nobody builds consensus or a new standard through point/counterpoint
email exchanges with zero details and no blueprint spec. Some real work
should be done first, making a reasoned proposal that others can then
review and consider its merits. The best standards are ones that are
shown to work in practice first, not in advance. There are many good
ideas, especially standards created before being built, that turn out
less than stellar in practice or worldwide acceptance (WEP, much OSI,
CORBA....).
And like my company does, there are lots of messaging platforms that
work well and have no spam/virus/bot issues and are in the marketplace
now. These are not international standards (yet?) and certainly are not
replacements for today's email. But work progresses....
David
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Gerald Klaas
- [Asrg] Fwd: Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Gerald Klaas
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops),
David Wall <=
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Seth
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Seth
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), David Nicol
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops), Gerald Klaas
|
|
|