4) there _could_ be value in an automated way to tell Earthlink about
abuse;
5) any use of <abuse(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)com> cannot serve that purpose;
Why not? I can't think why an "automated way" such as (4) mentions
couldn't be carried on top of email to abuse(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)com(_dot_)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(_at_)rodents-montreal(_dot_)org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg