ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Summary of junk button discussion

2010-02-26 06:22:59
On 25/Feb/10 21:28, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 2/25/2010 12:04 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 25/Feb/10 07:22, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 2/25/2010 12:45 AM, John Levine wrote:

The only think other than a junk button that appears useful is a
not-junk button to display when looking at stuff in a junk folder. I
suppose we could do that, but then we'd have to define what a junk
folder is.

I don't think John meant a "general" definition here... :-/

John seemed to be implying you can't have a "non-junk" button without a junk 
folder (eg: in an IMAP sense).

That seems reasonable...

I was just pointing out Thunderbird's "not junk" implementation, which is 
functional independent of the existence of any kind of foldering mechanism, IMAP or 
otherwise.

Yup. The JunQuilla extension makes that even more manageable. It is an interactive tool running on the end-user's box, though.

Heck, SpamAssassin even manages to tune Bayesian without having any end-user 
feedback at all.

I never adventured into such esoteric settings. Are there howtos or any docs about it?

To recap, junk buttons can be embedded within a more sophisticated
architecture (as for IMAP). But not the other way around: anti-spam
filter training cannot (in general) be based upon junk buttons and
abuse reporting.

Of course you can train spam filters based on abuse reports. We've been
doing precisely that for 13 years in several different incarnations.

Hm... I've been tinkering with my server's settings based on users' reports as well, but not automatically. There are various mechanisms, e.g. Vipul's Razor, that allow users to share their verdicts about the spamminess of a given message. However, in order to attach to junk buttons a meaning of "filter messages /like/ this" we would need to define what that means in rather unambiguous terms.

It may well make sense to include an "tickle IMAP" server as part of a
spec, but, also having an abuse reporting mechanism makes sure that you
have just about all implementations covered, IMAP or otherwise.

We could spec both, and leave it up to an installation or user to decide
which (or both) to use in any particular instance.

I'd lean toward specifying just how to deliver abuse reports. Neither junk buttons nor their color should be mandated.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg