In <000001c4a875$24fdf680$6c62fea9(_at_)ibmrkydk2ufvdd> "John Glube"
<jbglube(_at_)sympatico(_dot_)ca> writes:
Recently, on the SPF discuss list, a number of people have
come forward with an idea called Signed Envelope Sender
(SES).
This idea first surfaced quite early on, but was pushed to
the side when it was decided to go with the Sender
Rewriting System (SRS) as a work around to the problem with
breaking mail forwarding in checking mail from using SPF
records.
Uh, no. SRS was by far the first, SES leveraged SRS for a different
purpose. ABBS predates SES and BATV is a reinvention of both.
However, it has been suggested by at least one individual
that SES would be beyond scope of the CLEAR charter.
That is based off of this post:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mailsig/mail-archive/msg00180.html
Well, that and when I asked if SES and ABBS discussions had been moved
over here, I got no response from Dave Crocker.
-wayne