On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 08:57, Tony Finch wrote:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, wayne wrote:
Well, that and when I asked if SES and ABBS discussions had been moved
over here, I got no response from Dave Crocker.
I have not seen any discussion or specification of ABBS, and Google
doesn't help.
The SES specification needs some work to turn it into I-D form; it's
Seth and I are working to do so. Something will be made available on
the website and a post to this and the SES mailinglists. There is a
good chance that this will include working code for at least one major
MTA.
somewhat more ambitious than BATV and overlaps with the MASS charter, both
of which are likely to delay a standardized version of SES.
It is indeed and with good reason given that I believe domain keys is a
bad idea (placing the burden on the recipient is WRONG). We can not
keep tacking crap onto DNS and this is why I continue with my insistence
of a callback service unaffiliated with DNS.
Cheers,
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
( ( (
((__)) __\|/__ __|-|__ '. ___ .'
(00) (o o) (0~0) ' (> <) '
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-clear/attachments/20041003/1cdf56ee/attachment.bin