On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, John Leslie wrote:
At this point exim is fully coded and reasonably well tested. We're
led to expect it will be included in release version 4.5.2.
The CSA portion, IMHO, is already deployed, with no hints of glitches
which would require more experimental time.
However David Woodhouse has found an interoperability bug caused by one of
his mail servers having multiple CSA SRV records. I haven't yet
re-examined my code but, like the CSA specification, I believe it doesn't
take account of the possibility of multiple records. The specification
needs to be fixed in this respect. I suggested some fixes along these
lines a year ago (almost to the day!); see Message-ID:
<Pine(_dot_)SOL(_dot_)4(_dot_)58(_dot_)0406162005030(_dot_)25488(_at_)orange(_dot_)csi(_dot_)cam(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>.
Of course this
wording doesn't include the subdomain assertion stuff so it can't be used
as it is.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.