[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs

The CSA spec shall be updated to state that domains MUST NOT publish
multiple version 1 (priority==1) CSA SRV records for the same HELO
string. Receiving SMTP servers MAY return a permanent error in response
to the HELO/EHLO if more than one is found.


That would be wrong. The standard SMTP response for DNS configuration
errors is 4xx.


Tony is right.  (He always is.)  With that minor correction, I hope
we have achieved rough consensus and can move along to running code.

R's from sweaty Geneva,
John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[clear] Multiple SRV RRs, (continued) [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David Woodhouse [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David MacQuigg [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, Tony Finch [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, John Leslie [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David MacQuigg [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Leslie [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Douglas Otis [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Tony Finch [clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine <= [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, Mike Pinkerton [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David MacQuigg [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David MacQuigg [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, John Levine [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, Mike Pinkerton Message not available [clear] Multiple SRV RRs, David Woodhouse [clear] Plan of Action for CSV?, David Woodhouse [clear] Plan of Action for CSV?, Tony Finch [clear] DNS Records for CSV?, David MacQuigg

Previous by Date:	[clear] Plan of Action for CSV?, Rolf E. Sonneveld
Next by Date:	[clear] Plan of Action for CSV?, David MacQuigg
Previous by Thread:	[clear] Consensus on Multiple SRV RRs, Tony Finch
Next by Thread:	[clear] Multiple SRV RRs, Mike Pinkerton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]