ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted summary, SSP again

2006-01-27 10:02:11
John, this would be all well and good except for the fact that even
though my name isn't on the draft I've had a great deal to do with
it from even pre-DKIM days. Hector's interpretation is wrong, and
that's not how it should be implemented.

I don't have any strong feelings about SSP other than that it's unlikely
to be useful enough in anything like its current form to merit all the
time people are putting into it.

I'd really rather we put it on the shelf and concentrated on the core
signature and verification.  We all seem to agree that we need to improve
the body canonicalization rules, but I don't see any work on that beyond
my skeleton testing setup at http://forward.sp.am.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet 
for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org