This database that you insist is necessary for DKIM to be useful is pretty
well by definition a reputation system. So, if as you say a DKIM signature
has no value without a reputation system of some limited kind and reputation
is out of bounds, I guess I don't understand what you think we are doing
here?
creating an infrastructure.
(well, dkim also creates a bit of accountability, by my own view is that it does
not mean much without an assessment component, too. but as John Levine noted,
it can be a small, internal table of well-known correspondents.)
if you think dkim has larger value, on its own, please explain.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html