Dave, I disagree. We are defining how to verify a message. If we agree
that the mechanism below is a reasonable step to perform, it's still
just one more step in the verification process.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Dave Crocker wrote:
In particular:
The verifier then simply replaces the subject text with the value from
z= that was signed. That's one way of solving the mailing list
subject munging problem.
This goes far beyond the specification. While it might be useful, it is
really a heuristic and it is not part of the draft that is seeking
standardization.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html