Re: [Fwd: Re: [ietf-dkim] canonicalized null body and dkim]

Tony Hansen wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
> > Ok, so we've this and we've that. Who's volunteering to
> > craft new text for the document?
> I did so in my original note in this thread.
I guess what I am not sure about is whether a final <CRLF> is always 
required in the SIMPLE c14n method.
If so, then the minimum is always l=2.

But consider when l > 2, does this still mean the ending 2 bytes for the 
L amount is <CRLF>?
What if the actual text is larger than L?

Example:

12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
<CRLF>

here you have 52 bytes.  I believe canonicalized text size is l=50.

But what if the actual L= size defined in the DKIM-Signature: header is 
l=45? Is the canonicalized text then?
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
12345678<CRLF>
123<CRLF>

??

---
HLS


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html