Tony Hansen wrote:
That's why the issue was raised.
I firmly believe that we *intended* to canonicalize each of these cases
into the empty body
Well, that may or may not have been the intent, but the current spec
does say that
and it's my claim that what the current spec is doing is *useful* given
the mangling
that happens in the infrastructure. That is, we're getting better pass
rates when we
implement the spec as it is written now.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html