ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RE: I think we can punt the hard stuff as out ofscope.

2007-06-09 21:02:38
Douglas Otis wrote:

Well Doug, go ahead and proposed it, write an I-D, see how it flies in IETF-SMTP. And while you are there see if you get the IMC.ORG to stop using MAIL.IMG.ORG as the return path domain WITHOUT a MX record.

Using your concept, you effectly stopped all bounce mail back to their return path.

Hector,

You seem to have confused the concept of deprecate and obsolete. The suggestion was to deprecate the use of A records for discovery. (As in suggesting this will soon become obsolete.)

HA!  I call this a state of purgatory!! :-)

This suggestion will not cause mail.imc.org to cease functioning.
[CLIP]

Doug, this all sounds great.

But you still need to convince Paul to fix the return path for all
the managed IETF mailing list before you can even begin to discuss this
in IETF-SMTP. :-)

Once the argument is thrown out that only a "Few legit" systems still exist, hence it is safe to enforce a MX record, people will point that that not even an IETF entity is following the very concept you wish to make obsolete. So its not going to be very convincing that it now safe to do what you want across the board, yet alone change the SMTP specification.

This reminds me of the classic scene in Dumb and Dumber:  "What are my
chances?"  "Like one in a million"  "So I still have a chance!?"  :-)

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>