ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] The (really) latest SSP draft

2007-10-29 04:24:51


Charles Lindsey wrote:
So I think RFC 4871 ought to be "fixed" (unless we can find some way of fixing it in SSP, for example by enabling the SSP record to assert "we only sign where the From/Sender has been verified").

(chair headgear on)

I believe that that was all discussed during the development of
4871 and so should absolutely not be revistited now. Whether or
not SSP says somethiing about those headers is a different
matter, though is one that's not mentioned in 5016, and so I'd
expect you've a fairly high barrier to leap to get it into SSP
now.

In other words: we're not reviisting closed issues for fun.

Regards,
Stephen.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html