Michael Thomas wrote:
That mail abuse is such an extreme problem is probably the only reason we
would consider such a mechanism, but we need to be careful that we do
not use it to entirely disenfranchise possibly legitimate mail senders.
I assume you know what the meaning of "disenfranchise" is as you've chosen
to use it twice now. A legitimate user of my domain name is exactly who I
say is legitimate. There is no vote to be had on that issue, and as such no
vote to be taken away. Do you seriously dispute that?
Your perspective asserts certainties that we already know do not apply.
My point is exactly that SSP will be operating in a context of significant
uncertainty, yet it's design model really assumes differently.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html